Windows 7 patch location

Windows 7 patch location - Free Download

Ok, I fully understand that this is the wrong place to look for an answer, but I have spent hours Binging and Googling, and still have no clue as to where to find the answer. To restate the problem in slightly different terms, I am having a problem with Windows installer when it is invoked by windows update.

Several of these folders are created each day at the same time I have Windows update scheduled to apply updates. They are all empty, and they can be manually deleted. So, the question is "where can I look to find out how to tell windows to stop leaving these folders on my disk?

This is not an accurate observation. However, in such instances, and presuming familiarity with the behavior of the likely FEW installers that would be executed on a Server Operating System, it is also possible to PRE-extract those files onto the volume of your choice. First, I'm not a sounding board for official complaints to Microsoft. They have channels for doing that if that's what you want to do. I also, unlike a Microsoft employee, have the right to bail on the conversation when it becomes too pedantic.

Or perhaps a more fair answer would be that it's not exclusive to Microsoft. Microsoft products have been known to exhibit this behavior, I'm not denying that fact. So while I feel your pain Well I can confirm this behaviour categorically. When running Windows Update in the cases I have observed for WHS - we use them as little test targets for our development it will generate folders like the ones described on the drive with the greatest available space - There it decompresses the updates prior to installing them.

We have verified this in multiple examples looking at the actual files. It also only occurs during running an update something we only do manually on the test systems. So this is clearly caused by an MS "feature" of Windows Update. It's a nightmare for us because it pollutes data which is supposed to be an exact image of our test data and the Update junk gets synced up to our SAN.

Ok then ALL product teams are doing it. Curiously these all chose to put their temp files on the largest drive then to make the Windows Update Service Team look bad? Should we then complain in every single product area? That seems a lot of excessive cross-posting especially when they only time this happens is when doing a lot of updates through Windows Update at once. Still feel Update is the culprit here. It went straight for the 10TB array on V:. Now, if your gripe is about where the working directory is built, then I'd say you're barking up a tree you'll never climb.

If your gripe is about installers that fail to clean-up after themselves, then I'm totally on the climb with you I'm just saying you need to be climbing the right tree. My gripe is actually both because both behaviours are just dumb There are numerous examples where updates need to be kicked off manually and similarly many situations where certain drives should be off limits.

Then to rub salt in the wounds all these temp folders get left behind. That's been like that for 15 years, and software engineers way above the pay grade of either you or I had very distinct reasons for designing that way, I'm quite sure.

As for the failure of certain products to clean up after themselves, I think I've said all that can be said there too. There are ways to address this issue, although I'm hard pressed to understand why "certain drives" should be off limits to a process running in the context of a system administrator anyway who, by definition, has access to all of those drives.

Above my pay grade If you don't understand why we would manually kick off updates then you don't live in a real world which needs to quickly respond to business needs or realign with testing schedules. In fact if you don't understand why drives should be off limits you don't understand anything about enterprise configurations - it's fantastic to attach 10 new servers to the SAN, have them all patched to very specific but different patch levels for testing and find that by morning said array has been shotgunned with literally tens of thousands of files.

Anyway, clearly this is the Micosoft zealots thread and any further discussion is a distinct waste of time as you are not interested in investigating a solution but developing a PR standpoint.

Google led me to this den of patronizing MVPs. Like the original poster, I simply wanted an answer to the tech question, not a long thread of pompous rebuke and diatribe about forum catgories and the different flavors of Microsoft setup EXEs.

If the question is in the wrong category, just move the question thread to the correct category and notify the member silently. Without permission or warning, the EXE vomits onto the greatest-free-space drive a random-number-titled directory and squirts into it a boatload of temporary installation files. In my case, Microsoft's POS crapped all over a failing drive from which I was in the process of rescuing deleted files: BTW, I was compelled to install.

NET bloatware and probably is not even worth the bother. The vomiting still proceeds as above. So, rather than pompous self-aggrandisement "Badges" and "awards"? What is this, grade school? If you cannot do that, just remain silent and spare us from your useless, transparent, self-serving answers for your "badge" points.

I just discovered the reason my Windows Home Server C: Like the previous poster, I assume there is a registry entry of something I can set to direct Update somewhere other than my intentionally small C: I wondered if a symbolic link might work. This might be the answer: There is no wrong tree it's just people trying to get help where we can. Many of us search bing or google for similar answers and up here.

We aren't privy to Microsoft's insider understanding of where the truth lives or otherwise wouldn't be asking for help in the first place. Maybe just simplify your whole answer forum to one ombudsman smart enough to direct traffic to where it's supposed to go for the right answer. Isn't that what you advertise anyway? Because MSI was designed in almost-prehistoric times, I suppose. For MVP guys here - I understand you don't like to be treated this way.

But you make yourselves to be treated like this. I could continue arguing about some crappy aspects of Windows componentization and update aspects - but I won't. I like many others have come across this thread whilst trying to find an answer to a 'real world' non ivory-tower problem. When it then shut down the SQL Cluster service to install the update, it also took down the drive the update had installed to.

If Windows Update is invoking windows installer files, it should either be specifying paths to the msiexec installer, or the windows update team should be feeding this back to a central team to raise awareness of a problem. Surely there is a central "architecture team" in Microsoft to ensure all groups are using the same approach, and to catch problems that are affecting multiple packages and operating systems?

The attidude of "contact each vendor and group in Microsoft" is ridiculous. The fix needs to be done by Microsoft, and rolled out using Windows Update! In the real world outside Microsoft, we also have lots of teams and groups. We don't fob off our customers with "we don't look after this" style excuses. Any updates on this? I am having the same issues that Goblin C is experiencing and can't seem to find anything that helps.

This is exactly how I would expect this to all work. The reality is quite different what seems to be happening is the update downloads to the C Drive, unpacks to the E drive shared and then the whole process falls to bits when the server fails over when the system attempts to fail over to another node. This means that we have to remediate these manually. This site uses cookies for analytics, personalized content and ads.

By continuing to browse this site, you agree to this use. Office Office Exchange Server. Not an IT pro? Remove From My Forums. Sign in to vote. Is there any way of steering the Update service to restrict itself to local drives or even better to specify an exact path for the temporary download folder.

I have been searching the internet for an answer to this but so far drawn a blank. I'm hoping this might be the forum with an answer. Wednesday, March 17, 1: Windows Update and for all I know other MS Update services appears todownload to a temporary folder in the root of the drive with the most free space at the time of the download. This is not an accurate statement.

If you're downloading from the Microsoft Download Center, IE may be writing the temporary file into the cache before copying to the final destination. Windows Installer does create a temporary folder on the logical volume with the most free space, during the actual installation process, but that folder is be deleted after use.

However, your issue here is with the Windows Installer application, and using the appropriate options where available to control the location of the installation directory on such systems when performing such installations is the solution. As Robear notes, it's really beyond the scope of this forum.

But then, as noted, this is not the Update Service causing this scenario, but rather the Windows Installer. Possibly because you're lookin' up the wrong tree for the answer. Monday, March 22, 4: You'd be much better off posting in the appropriate Windows Server forum, Bill: File Services and Storage Forum http: Thursday, March 18, 8: As this thread has been quiet for a while, we assume that the issue has been resolved.

If the issue still persists and you want to return to this question, please reply this post directly so we will be notified to follow it up.

windows 7 patch  location

Where are windows updates stored on computer harddrive? What folder

The fix needs to be done by Microsoft, and rolled out using Windows Update! Sunday, May 14, 9: Take SQL Server offline so that the cluster drives disappeared. There are ways to address this issue, although I'm hard pressed to understand why "certain drives" should be off limits to a process running in the context of a system administrator anyway who, by definition, has access to all of those drives. United States - English. But it happens when the computer starts up everytime the program treis to download and install then disappears not finishing the job Or perhaps a more fair answer would be that it's not exclusive to Microsoft. Friday, April 18, 5: Windows should have automatically recreated the Download folder.

windows update file location

My gripe is actually both because both behaviours are just dumb Skip to main content. Wednesday, March 17, 1: Ok then ALL product teams are doing it. Depending on which text editor you're pasting into, you might have to add the italics to the site name. That seems a lot of excessive cross-posting especially when they only time this happens is when doing a lot of updates through Windows Update at once. If WinUpdate uses such crappy tech as MSI and is unable to manage it in a reasonable fashion, then it's crappy too. So this is clearly caused by an MS "feature" of Windows Update.

Repairing the Windows 7 Update Folder Location

windows 7 patch  location

Depending on which text editor you're pasting into, you might have to add the italics to the site name. For MVP guys here - I understand you don't like to be treated this way. Accessed 21 October For those in pain, I've found two links which may be useful. Bosna i Hercegovina - Hrvatski. Isn't that what you advertise anyway? We also provide an extensive Windows 7 tutorial section that covers a wide range of tips and tricks. Friday, April 18, 5: What is this, grade school? But you make yourselves to be treated like this. Office Office Exchange Server. I'm just saying you need to be climbing the right tree. The temporary update files are stored at C:

Summary
Review Date
Reviewed Item
Windows 7 patch location
Author Rating
51star1star1star1star1star

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *