Crack for windows server 2008 r2 64 bit - Free Download
Could someone please advice us what is the best redundant setup? Until sofar we have only seen solutions that use a standby server , but as said we would like to use both servers if possible.
Your holy grail would be a fail-over cluster, as Stefan pointed out. But for a failover cluster you would need a cluster storage. If you don't want to invest into additional hardware you can go for database mirroring.
It is not fully transparent for the application, but doable. But this is still a year out. Well, actually I have used a SQL failover cluster without external hardware storage for quite a while before But the setup required some software components that don't come cheap e. You also need someone who is really fit with all involved components meaning Network, storage concepts, windows clustering as well as SQL server , otherwise you run the risk of doing it wrong and loosing data in the worst case.
It's doable, but not recommended Remove From My Forums. Sign in to vote. Wednesday, November 10, 1: Marked as answer by Michel Posseth Wednesday, November 10, 2: You may take a look at http: Wednesday, November 10, 2: Edited by Michel Posseth Wednesday, November 10, 2: Ahh, no, this does not work. You need an external shared storage. Take a look at log shipping, if you don't get one: To clarify a bit further, SQL Server does not support load balancing clustering.
It only supports failover clustering HA where a single node in the cluster will be used for that instance of SQL Server. There are other techniques that can be implemented to share the database load, but they all require changes to how the application accesses the data. You could setup replication — so a specific instance of SQL Server could be used for reporting for example.
You could also setup merge replication to each instance is an exact copy of the other. Or a combination — however, this requires that your application be modified to use the replicated databases and perform the load balancing. Both of these use shared clustering that load balances across multiple nodes for accessing the data. And finally, all clustering technologies require shared storage to work. You would have to have storage available at the same time to each node in the cluster.
Wednesday, November 10, 5:
microsoft windows server 2008 r2 64 bit
Sexually explicit or offensive language. But this is still a year out. By continuing to browse this site, you agree to this use. Flaming or offending other users. Windows Server General Forum.
Windows Server 2008 R2 SP1 [!Full Version ISO] Free Download [3 GB]
Microsoft Windows Server R2 Bit features new virtualization tools, Web resources, management enhancements, and exciting Windows 7 integration help save time, reduce costs, and provide a platform for a dynamic and efficiently managed data center. Not an IT pro? Your holy grail would be a fail-over cluster, as Stefan pointed out. Well, actually I have used a SQL failover cluster without external hardware storage for quite a while before It is latest version. By continuing to browse this site, you agree to this use. Sign in to vote. When I try to apply the hotfix supplied by Microsoft I get a message that it does not apply to our system.
Best Regards, Eve Wang Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help. Advertisements or commercial links. Read Sticky Post at the top of the forum. Clicking on the Download Now Visit Site button above will open a connection to a third-party site. If you don't want to invest into additional hardware you can go for database mirroring. Compatible for x86 bit Windows and x64 bit Windows Developers: Tuesday, October 17, 3: And finally, all clustering technologies require shared storage to work. Is this false positive? By continuing to browse this site, you agree to this use.